Oil and energy
Asset risk · maintenance windowWill you spot the risk before the asset chooses the shutdown date?
OpenNeko is AI that checks condition readings against maintenance work, spares, contractor availability, and the production plan. It finds when a manageable warning is becoming an expensive operational decision.
Do you recognise this?
The asset is still running. Your options are shrinking.
A reading crosses the alert level, but the asset has not tripped, so the production plan still treats it as available.
The inspection has already moved twice because stopping today feels more expensive than waiting.
The necessary spare and specialist are each on a different schedule from the planned shutdown.
When the condition worsens, the team may discover that the safe, planned response is no longer available.
What OpenNeko does
AI that checks asset condition against what a safe response actually requires.
Checks more than the alarm
Reads condition changes alongside open work, past deferrals, operating limits, production demand, and redundancy.
Finds the disappearing window
Connects the spare, specialist, permit, shutdown, and production constraints that decide whether maintenance can still happen safely.
Gets the decision ready
Prepares the options, owners, deadlines, and production effect so Reliability and Operations can choose before the asset chooses for them.
See the AI work
The compressor has not tripped. The production plan is already exposed.
The condition trend, overdue inspection, spare arrival, specialist schedule, and lack of practical redundancy make the planned shutdown impossible as currently prepared.
Drive-end vibration reached 7.1 mm/s twice in 24 hours—above the 6.0 site alert but below the 9.0 shutdown level.
The compressor inspection is 11 days overdue after two production deferrals.
No replacement dry gas seal is at site; the region’s only spare is reserved for another critical compressor.
A new dry gas seal arrives 22 Sep, six days after the planned shutdown begins.
The vibration specialist leaves the region on 18 Sep; the next slot is five weeks later.
The parallel compressor is already at 92% load during peak production.
The compressor cannot be inspected and repaired inside the planned shutdown with the current spare and specialist plan.
Confirm the operating limit and whether the latest readings require immediate inspection.
Compare moving the region’s spare with expediting a new seal, including risk at both sites.
Secure the specialist and approve an 18-hour outage, or move the maintenance and production plans together.
Move the spare by 15 Sep, inspect on 16 Sep, and complete the repair in an 18-hour outage: six hours at reduced rate instead of a five-week deferral.
Where to start
Start with the assets and plans that leave no room for surprise.
Critical asset risk
Check changing condition against operating limits, open work, redundancy, and production demand—not the alarm in isolation.
Maintenance-window readiness
Confirm that work scope, permits, people, spares, and production plans will be ready for the same window.
Spares and contractor conflicts
Find when a scarce spare or specialist has been committed elsewhere while the asset risk is rising.
Production deviations
Explain when a local change in equipment, feed, quality, or maintenance threatens a wider production commitment.
Check the critical compressor fleet whenever condition, maintenance, spares, specialist availability, or the production plan changes. Prepare the decision before the safe window closes.
Your business. Your rules.
Use AI without handing it the keys.
OpenNeko runs in infrastructure you control. You choose what it can access, what it can prepare, and what needs a person's approval before anything changes.
See how control worksSee it work
See OpenNeko work across your business.
Bring one expensive problem. See OpenNeko check the software involved, explain what is going wrong, and get the next action ready.
